Next | |
---|---|
Lidraughts Feedback - Mistakes in puzzles#45 Puzzle 2155: 1. 38-32 27x47 2. 37-31 47x20 3. 26-21 is also winning. | MI Malacia |
Lidraughts Feedback - Mistakes in puzzles#42 Puzzle 2099: 5. 05-37 (coup Turc!) and 6. 42-37 is also winning. | MI Malacia |
Lidraughts Feedback - Well deserved promotion#1 Well deserved promotion to some draught federation webpage. imgur.com/a/wQ0pnvh It's maybe a good id to mention some great news of the chess world in the lidraughts website... like Georgiev just… | Archange007 |
Lidraughts Feedback - Mistakes in puzzles#41 Puzzle 2062: several winning variants are missed: - 2. 27-21 3. 34-29 - 2. 27-21 3. 37-31 - 3. 27-21 | Tim |
General Draughts Discussion - Scan learns Frisian and Antidraughts#10 As for antidraughts, you might adapt some principles from English antidraughts; a digitalized book is available at https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Sheffield_Draught_Player.html?id=N1hVAAAAcA… | kalnap |
Lidraughts Feedback - Automatic capture option Opt-in Oput-out#9 Automatic capture is justified when it is forced (no other options). Only kids (and not all kids) can enjoy that all possible captures are indicated and that a computer stops automati capture at point… | kalnap |
Lidraughts Feedback - Mistakes in puzzles#34 Puzzle 1948: lots of winning moves are marked as incorrect, such as 4. 42-37, 5. 42-37, and 5. 34-30. | Tim |
Lidraughts Feedback - Mistakes in puzzles#20 About 1059: yes, lots of moves and final squares for the King are correct. 42-37 and 47-41 are considered correct in the puzzle (as well as the different squares to end with the King). Unfotunately 38… | BumperBalloonCars |
Lidraughts Feedback - Mistakes in puzzles#18 Puzzle 1059: on the sixth move (with opposite kings) multiple wins are possible apart from the expected 38-32. My 38-33 (29x38 43x32 etc. try) was deemed wrong. I didn't check 42-37 and 47-41, but tho… | GMI simpaticheski |
General Draughts Discussion - Scan's endgame skills could and should be improved#6 Here is a nice puzzle that Scan was unable to solve even at depth 37: https://lidraughts.org/study/foIbE6cs/FEuzIPfi (I dare to say that any upper-intermediate player can solve it easily). | kalnap |