Hi @Roitelet, It is certainly not the case that we don't listen to players, you input and that of others is very much appreciated, necessary even. We have made many changes already based on sugges…

The most prominent part of this subject here is: Having more time to think in games in tournaments. We constantly look into that. What is and what isn't correct, in this moment of time, is based…

"We can add some variation in the current schedule, e.g. alternate 3+0 with 3+2 timecontrols." This sounds like a good idea.

Hi RoepStoep, Thanks for taking the time to answer. I am disappointed by your answer though. I can assure you that I play 200-300 ELO points better in 3+2 than 3+0. I just simply can't finish…

Hi @Roitelet, On your first point: it is a choice you can make, but we made a different one. Some of the reasons why are discussed in another thread: https://lidraughts.org/forum/lidraughts-feedba…

The naming must be the same, so all studies will be easy to find that belong together (different books, a lót of studies and chapters). I suggest: 1. Tjalling for the starting name, in honor of …

Hi there, The platform is fantastic. Great job! However, I have 2 issues. 2 big ones actually. 1) I find the pieces management awkward. On any draughts software, one can move a piece with jus…

I think the only question is: make autocapture an option or not. If you would implement the option: The basic starting settings on the website should be slow captures in animation, all captures …

I am trying to play bullet with draughts, but I think it is a bit too fast. Even if you are winning you often don't have the time to finish it and it is more a tactic of playing fast and win by flaggi…

I played against MI Thunderstorm a few games antidraughts 3+0. It's really fast. I think 5+0 is a better time control.