Yes "Классические шахматы" should be "Классические шашки". Thanks for fixing it.

@mathejoy Ah yes, I didn't notice that, will make the pieces a bit smaller!

Yes and yes. Yes, it's more easy to cheat now that everyone in the world can easily use an engine. Yes, cheat detection is important. I can assure you that is not something to worry about. Bans …

Yes, but black can also play 16-21 and be up a piece, there are no trading possibilities for that one. However, you can argue that it is worth it because of the positional benefit. Like a gambit in a …

I got the question if 33-38 is really a good move. For an answer I need to trust other sources than myself, and yes it is indeed a reasonable way to play in this position. It seems counter-intuitive, …

Yes that is almost correct. The one thing you have to keep in mind is that rule only applies if a player also still has man on the board. If he/she has only kings, the rule does not apply, and he/…

An A.I. for every variant is certainly a goal. So yes!

I think the answer is yes. Also most code can probably just be transported from the lichess implementation. So far I can see the UCI protocol is not so chess specific, only the "mate" feature can be d…

Hi all, The answer is yes, that addition is high on our agenda. Unfortunately, we can not give a timeframe (yet) when to expect this great future feature. FYI: Implementing an A.I. (or draughts…

@BumperBalloonCars Thanks, I'm aware of that having made Antichess studies on lichess and confident it must be same here with variants. Yes study no puzzles.