@Maserati The engine analysis is enabled for 10x10 board only because apart from Fabien Letouzey, the developper of Scan, no one programmer was willing to contribute or to adapt his engine to lidraugh…

@CyberSpeed , I think a 50x50 board like this is too big, ahhahahahah

English and Turkish checkers are also popular. It wouldn't be bad to add them) It's just my idea

I'm talking about AI analysis on boards in Russian and Brazilian variants. There are many checkers programs for analysis 64 but why can't you do the analysis in Lidraughts?) Why the limitation to only…

Theoretically, it is possible, but practically nobody will dedicated 6 hours for a single game. Just for comparison purposes, in Canadian draughts (12x12 board) you reach the later stage of middlegam…

How about a 50x50 board!!!

Let me state again: we don't need any engine analysis for any variant on 8x8 board. Why? You need to respect the efforts of MASTERS who had already provided major lines in ANY opening. The engine …

For me to improve here : 1) Would add English checkers (Checkers 64). 2) Would add Turkish checkers 3) Would add the artificial intelligence of the analysis of the games that is present in the 100…

@statmatt (1) A separate analysis board with an export in pdn (portable draughts notation format; see https://pdn.fmjd.org/introduction.html ) should be sufficient. While it is easy to convert pgn to…

I am one of the developers on PlayStrategy. We know we have more variants than lidraughts and offer Swiss tournaments which is missing here. However we also know we are lacking all of the analysis too…