@RoepStoep Your most important reason is, I think, not valid. Your main argument is about dexterity. Well, we are talking about the game of draughts, right. Draughts has not been invented as a dext…

I suppose you live in the Netherlands. In my country, we don't play +0 tournaments anymore. Not only it is better because you can play the endgame, but it leads to fewer refereeing situations that wer…

It seems everybody is in agreement on autocaptures being a bad idea, at least that's something :) It is a design choice to add one-click captures or not, this is by no means a necessity. We have ma…

Hi @Roitelet, It is certainly not the case that we don't listen to players, you input and that of others is very much appreciated, necessary even. We have made many changes already based on sugges…

For now, I still agree with my earlier statement about the one-click captures. About the numbers: Some people are for and against the idea of one-click captures. It would be very interesting when…

The most prominent part of this subject here is: Having more time to think in games in tournaments. We constantly look into that. What is and what isn't correct, in this moment of time, is based…

I would tend to think the same, Tim. No auto-captures is my preference. But minimal click GUI, we need.

"We can add some variation in the current schedule, e.g. alternate 3+0 with 3+2 timecontrols." This sounds like a good idea.

I am not sure auto-captures would be an improvement. I remember playing with auto-captures but don't recall having anything for or against it. However, I think it is essential to have the minimal c…

Hi @Roitelet, On your first point: it is a choice you can make, but we made a different one. Some of the reasons why are discussed in another thread: https://lidraughts.org/forum/lidraughts-feedba…