I was testing Scan's endgame technique in International draughts by comparing human approach and AI approach. There is a nice puzzle by Noome and Hortsman (I quote their names by cyrillic retransla…

Я сыграл с Scan несколько партий в Antidraghts. Время на игру - 10+3. Уровень №7 и №8 вообще нельзя обыграть! После этих поражений моя самооценка понизилась. А я думал, что я хорошо играю... У уровн…

Hi @BumperBalloonCars, I immediately believe that only less than 5% of the puzzles has to be corrected, since the vast majority of the puzzles are really nice! I am grateful - and with me many Lidr…

3: 48-43 and 40-34 are also winning

So other members of this community can understand the gravity of the issue, the message I am referring to is litterally "go fuck off, bastard, talk alot of shit" as a reply to a kind private message i…

Yes, I saw that one when I created the puzzle. In this case, Scan evaluates the position on depth 34 with 'just' +3 (after 8 minutes evaluating). With the 'right' solution the evaluation is +7 on …

Oi amigos @BumperBalloonCars e @Arkun. Após exaustiva análise no Scan3.0 e KingsRow, pode-se afirmar que realmente a partida está ganha para as pretas. Segue: [Event "Game 1, opening start …

I'm still curious where the -0.9 comes from. I missed 10.3-9, but after 11.27-22 9-13 white can play 12.47-42 and it seems black needs to give another piece. Seems like draw to me (which is obviously …

Most important is the fact that if black does not make the combination, black will lose a piece with an evaluation of at least +1 obviously. So, also important in a game, sometimes you need to find th…

In tournaments, time is set for a 5 + 0 game. I propose to change to 5 + 3. Playing without adding time is hard. Who agrees with this?