In the meantime, bot-accounts have been added to lidraughts, although thoroughly untested. The API is the same as on lichess, so in theory the same clients should work (as long as you remember that ca…

That's nice to hear, enjoy! You are a very serious Antidraughts player, how did you learn the game so well? Приятно слышать, наслаждайтесь! Вы очень серьезный игрок Antidraughts, как вы так хорошо …

Scan does not support multipv, so it only gives the best move. Multipv is definitely on the wishlist, but until then there is only one line

Hi @BumperBalloonCars! Thank you again for your extensive answer! I'm looking forward to those new features (and ready to test them). For now, another comment on a puzzle: Puzzle 1479 (https://…

Hi @simpaticheski and all, I agree, it would be better to get all the puzzle feedback in one topic. Thnx for the feedback! The puzzles are disabled. About 1446: Sadly but understandably, i…

While this is based on lichess code, I would suggest the implementation of automatic capture as a user-wise parameter (some user can opt for it, some others can chose not to opt for it). In chess, cap…

Lots of transpositions and moveorders again here. I missed in one of them the move 22-18 as a possible win, so yes, this one should be corrected as well, thnx.

Good question @Bobkingmen3 This is because of the rules of the game (for completeness): https://lidraughts.org/variant/standard Two rules to point out: 1. You can't capture a piece twice. So, i…

The combination you found is beautiful indeed. But I think this line in the puzzle is better because: After the puzzel line of 34-29 (24-30 35x13 18x9), on depth 34 the evaluation is around the +3.…

it's ok,thanks you the difference it's after 1. 21-27, and so on,he can take 16*27 instead of 23*32 because of 21-26. and I didn't see 13-18 and 08-13 while white take 5*37