@RoepStoep Your most important reason is, I think, not valid. Your main argument is about dexterity. Well, we are talking about the game of draughts, right. Draughts has not been invented as a dext…

Hi @Roitelet, It is certainly not the case that we don't listen to players, you input and that of others is very much appreciated, necessary even. We have made many changes already based on sugges…

For now, I still agree with my earlier statement about the one-click captures. About the numbers: Some people are for and against the idea of one-click captures. It would be very interesting when…

The most prominent part of this subject here is: Having more time to think in games in tournaments. We constantly look into that. What is and what isn't correct, in this moment of time, is based…

Hi RoepStoep, Thanks for taking the time to answer. I am disappointed by your answer though. I can assure you that I play 200-300 ELO points better in 3+2 than 3+0. I just simply can't finish…

The naming must be the same, so all studies will be easy to find that belong together (different books, a lót of studies and chapters). I suggest: 1. Tjalling for the starting name, in honor of …

Hi there, The platform is fantastic. Great job! However, I have 2 issues. 2 big ones actually. 1) I find the pieces management awkward. On any draughts software, one can move a piece with jus…

Yeah, 35*24 is indeed nicer. I try to vary a bit, cause many of these combination (the bombshot and atomic-bomb shots) have multiple recaptures for the opponant. To show that other lines should be…

In Lichess there is a limit of 64 chapters for a study. Do we have the same here? If so, is it possible to change that? I ask the question because I have the idea of creating studies for Tjalli…

@Pietjepuk : The website alone indeed probably won't solve this problem. Though, we believe draughts still was lacking a website, where all useful features are at one place. Therefore it's a very impo…