| Next | |
|---|---|
| Lidraughts Feedback - Excercise 44 broken?#1 Scan says "mate in 5" but the puzzle is mate in 4. https://lidraughts.org/practice/rules-frisian/seven-move-rule/jClEaVnK/MB81xUa4 | Toadofsky |
| General Draughts Discussion - Russian draughts software#4 Please see https://lidraughts.org/@/AOD and https://lidraughts.org/team/lidraughtsbots and https://lidraughts.org/api for some information about bots. | Toadofsky |
| Game Analysis - Is this really a draw?#5 #4 Cool, 1 vs 4 could be interesting to learn. In this particular game 113. 15-4 seems the most beginner-friendly solution (113... 36-47 114. 43-49 47-36 115. 33-47). | Toadofsky |
| Lidraughts Feedback - Bullet is maybe too fast#15 IMHO assisted play (auto-capture) should be limited to casual games (and puzzles). | Toadofsky |
| Lidraughts Feedback - Feature Request(?): Keyboard Move Entry#1 I want to learn the coordinates better, so I am curious whether keyboard move entry works. I'd test it but can't find an opponent at the moment. | Toadofsky |
| Lidraughts Feedback - Feature Request: Coordinates in every square#12 Thank you!! :-) | Toadofsky |
| Game Analysis - Frisian Draughts #3 Can we please nullify section 21 "Further rules of play"? | Toadofsky |
| Game Analysis - Puzzle 56#2 Thanks to @BumperBalloonCars for explaining; I mis-evaluated the final position (which is better for Black but not convincingly winning as in the main line). | Toadofsky |
| Game Analysis - Puzzle 56#1 I'm curious why 1... 14-19 which seems strong isn't also a solution: https://lidraughts.org/training/56 | Toadofsky |
| Lidraughts Feedback - Will we get an A.I.?#4 Shorter-term I'm curious whether a BOT API would be feasible, something like https://lichess.org/blog/WvDNticAAMu_mHKP/welcome-lichess-boats Then again, I wonder whether there's a standard draughts… | Toadofsky |